<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Validating HTML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richsage.com/validating-html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richsage.com/validating-html/</link>
	<description>Make Money Community</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: RichSage</title>
		<link>http://www.richsage.com/validating-html/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>RichSage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richsage.com/?p=544#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>Well, I can almost agree with you.  The problem with what you suggest is the it's a yes or no type of issue.  Either you have a perfect score or there is a problem.  The advantage of the validation at W3C is that you can pick the worst problems and address them quickly.

I don't look for perfection in the HTML  --just good behavior.  I've looked at several other sites, like shoemoney, which has hundreds of errors in the last post!

So, I don't spend a lot of time trying to 'get each post' perfect.

RS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can almost agree with you.  The problem with what you suggest is the it&#8217;s a yes or no type of issue.  Either you have a perfect score or there is a problem.  The advantage of the validation at W3C is that you can pick the worst problems and address them quickly.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t look for perfection in the HTML  &#8211;just good behavior.  I&#8217;ve looked at several other sites, like shoemoney, which has hundreds of errors in the last post!</p>
<p>So, I don&#8217;t spend a lot of time trying to &#8216;get each post&#8217; perfect.</p>
<p>RS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g1smd</title>
		<link>http://www.richsage.com/validating-html/#comment-1111</link>
		<dc:creator>g1smd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richsage.com/?p=544#comment-1111</guid>
		<description>I use the HTML Validator extension for Firefox instead.

Just look for the Green Tick in the bottom right to know the code is 100% correct.

If there is a yellow exclamation mark or a red cross,  then click it to bring up a list of errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the HTML Validator extension for Firefox instead.</p>
<p>Just look for the Green Tick in the bottom right to know the code is 100% correct.</p>
<p>If there is a yellow exclamation mark or a red cross,  then click it to bring up a list of errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
